“You do well to wish to learn our arts and ways of life, and above all, the religion of Jesus Christ. These will make you a greater and happier people than you are.” – George Washington

While our country was certainly founded upon religious principles, it is not exactly certain which religion(s)[1] that may have been. In addition to Christianity, a belief known as deism competed for a great many of our influential founders. Often told is the story of Thomas Jefferson pouring over his Bible by candlelight—scissors in hand—excising anything that hinted of the supernatural.[2] Besides Jefferson, mention is made to Benjamin Franklin, John Adams, Thomas Paine, and James Madison as proponents of this divergent belief. It has long been alleged that George Washington assumed the same deism as these fellow founding fathers. But is this assumption accurate?

In order to answer that question, it might first be helpful to understand deism.

What is deism?

Deism is the exaggeration of the truth of God’s transcendence.[3]

Deism was religion stripped of revelation. It was “enlightened” religion.

The Age of Enlightenment of the 17th and 18th centuries gave birth to great confidence in the authority of reason and man’s ability to arrive at truth unaided by anything other than his own mind. Rationality reigned.

Deism simply took the tenets of the Enlightenment project and applied it to the domain of religious conviction. Utter reliance upon reason led to the devaluation and ultimate denial of special revelation (particularly the Scriptures and the Son). Reason replaced revelation as the final authority for all religion.

The analogy that is typically used to describe the tenets of deism is that of a cosmic clockmaker. God simply created the universe, wound up its natural laws, and retreated to allow it to run its course. He is utterly and only transcendent. There is no recognition of immanence. There is no confession of God’s personal workings with the universe. God becomes a depersonalized entity. He is an “absentee landlord.”

Jonathan Edwards, a contemporary of Washington’s (though 29 years his elder), wrote this of the deists of his time: They own the being of God; but deny that Christ was the son of God, and say he was a mere cheat; and so they say all the prophets and apostles were: and they deny the whole Scripture. They deny that any of it is the word of God. They deny any revealed religion, or any word of God at all; and say that God has given mankind no other light to walk by but their own reason.

What about Washington?

Mary V. Thompson, a researcher for the Mount Vernon estate, typically responded to e-mails and letters to the estate regarding the identity of Washington’s religious beliefs with history’s assumption of deism. However, tiring of rehearsed answers to such queries, Thompson set out to search through the primary and secondary evidences herself. Such research was compiled in her somewhat recent book, “In the Hands of a Good Providence: Religion in the Life of George Washington.”[4]

In attempting to frame her conclusions, the author draws upon personal and public statements that Washington made, his charitable donations, his church attendance as understood within certain contextual factors, statements by family and friends as to his beliefs, his thoughts on slavery and other social and moral issues, and the overall religious culture in which Washington lived. Her conclusion is that our first president, though perhaps not as explicit or emotional as we tend to approve of today, was nonetheless fairly well representative of the Christian faith as it was expressed within his particular environment.

Was Washington a Christian? Timothy Dwight, grandson of Jonathan Edwards, framed the issue well:

The evidence concerning it must of course arise from an induction of particulars. Some will induce more of these particulars, and others fewer; some will rest on one class, or collection, others on another; and some will give more, and others less, weight to those which are induced; according to several modes and standards of judging. The question in this, and all other cases, must be finally determined before another tribunal, than that of human judgment; and to that tribunal it must ultimately be left. For my own part, I have considered his numerous and uniform public and most solemn declarations to his high veneration for religion, his exemplary and edifying attention to public worship, and his constancy in secret devotion, as proofs sufficient to satisfy every person, willing to be satisfied. I shall only add, that if he was not a Christian, he was more like one than any man of same description, whose life has been hitherto recorded.[5]

The reality of all religion will finally be exposed at a future time and at a future throne by the Founder of the true faith, Jesus Christ. To Him alone belongs all ultimate authority to make such judgments. Until then, for those interested in insight into the culture and context of the early years of this country and one of its most celebrated commanders, I certainly recommend “In the Hands of Providence.”

Update: Peter Lillback, president of Westminster Theological Seminary, comes to the same conclusion regarding Washington’s faith in his book, “George Washington’s Sacred Fire” which recently went number one on Amazon.


[1] It is important to note that the term “religion” as used within the 18th century in particular carried a different connotation than it does today. It is anachronistic to judge that period’s use of the term by today’s standards in which “religion” and “Christianity” are often contrasted. For many in the 18th century, religion was simply a synonym for the historic orthodox faith. See in particular Jonathan Edwards’ consistent use of the term. As with all words, context must determine how the intended use.

[2] To this day, you can still purchase a copy of Jefferson’s edited “Bible” which consists of mostly of sayings of Christ and is devoid of such “extravagances” as the incarnation and resurrection.

[3] Strong, A. H. (2004). Systematic theology (414). Bellingham, Wa.: Logos Research Systems, Inc.

[4] Mary V. Thompson, “In the Hands of a Good Providence: Religion in the Life of George Washington,” (Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press, 2008).

[5] Thompson, 181.

,

Do not love the world or the things in the world. If anyone loves the world, the love of the Father is not in him. For all that is in the world—the desires of the flesh and the desires of the eyes and pride in possessions—is not from the Father but is from the world. And the world is passing away along with its desires, but whoever does the will of God abides forever.

1 John 2:15-17

William Law once wrote, “And indeed the world, by professing Christianity, is so far from being a less dangerous enemy than it was before, that it has by its favors destroyed more Christians than ever it did by the most violent persecution.  We must, therefore, be so far from considering the world as in a state of less enmity and opposition to Christianity than it was in the first times of the Gospel, that we must guard against it as a greater and more dangerous enemy now than it was in those times.  It is a greater enemy, because it has greater power over Christians by its favors, riches, honors, reward, and protection, than it had by the fire and fury of its persecutions.  It is a more dangerous enemy by having lost its appearance of enmity…”[1]

Law’s recognition is at the heart of Crossway’s Worldliness: Resisting the Seduction of a Fallen World.

Edited by C.J. Mahaney, the book contains six chapters on loving the world. The middle four detail specific dangers in regards to our love in the following areas: media (particularly movies and television), music, possessions, and fashion. The first chapter serves as an introduction to the 1 John verse and the final chapter details the proper manner in which we are called to love the world.

John Piper introduces the book with a foreword on the value of drawing lines and establishing boundaries, when such limits are free and loving fruits of the gospel and not merely legalistic restrictions. I thought his most helpful thought is that “we will be shaped by the world without intentional efforts not to be.” This idea runs throughout the book as the various authors strive to remind us again and again of the value of intentional, deliberate, and purposeful watching, listening, and purchasing. We must not be passive.

The book functions as a self-assessment in which readers are called to take an honest look at their enjoyments, engagements, and entertainments. For the most part, the pastors who write the various chapters do not attempt to draw specific lines for you, but rather help you to see various dangers that you might not otherwise notice in your entertainments.

Rather than truly summarize each chapter, here are a few thoughts from each chapter.

Chapter 1: “Is This Verse in Your Bible?” by C.J. Mahaney

Mahaney uses the example of Demas (2 Timothy 4:10) who deserted Paul out of love for the world. How did this occur? Through drifting, “a gradual weakening, a subtle contaminating, and an eventual conforming to this world…It begins with a dull conscience and a listless soul.”

Mahaney’s words remind me of the first command in the book of Hebrews: Therefore we must pay much closer attention to what we have heard, lest we drift away from it (2:1). Drifting is exceedingly dangerous. The world is flowing away from the gospel. Unless we paddle against the current, we too will drift.

Chapter 2: “God, My Heart, and Media” by Craig Cabaniss

Here are a few of the questions that Cabaniss offers to help with assessing the benefits of watching a particular movie, television show, or spending time surfing the web.

Time Questions:

  • Am I skipping or delaying something important to watch this now?
  • What are my social/entertainment options besides watching television or going out to see a movie?
  • How much time have I already spent on media today?
  • How much time have I spent surfing the Internet? How much time have I spent blogging or maintaining an online presence through social network sites?
  • In the last week, how much time have I spent on the spiritual disciplines, building relationships, or serving in my local church compared to time spent consuming media?
  • After investing the time to view this, will I look back on it as time well spent?

Heart Questions:

  • Why do I want to watch this program or film? What do I find entertaining about it?
  • Am I seeking to escape from something I should be facing by watching this? Am I seeking comfort or relief that can be found only in God?
  • What sinful temptations will this program or film present?
  • Do I secretly want to view something in it that’s sinful?
  • Am I watching because I’m bored or lazy? If so, what does that reveal about my heart?
  • Am I watching simply because others are?

Content Questions:

  • What worldview or philosophy of life does this program or film present? What’s the view of man’s nature? What’s the view of sin?
  • What does this program or film glamorize? What is valued or considered important?
  • Is sin shown as having negative consequences? Or is sin glorified or rewarded? Is sin presented in an appealing or seductive way?
  • What’s the sexual content?
  • Does the program or film portray materialism as “the good life”?
  • Would seeing this help me better understand God’s world? Would it help me understand my surrounding culture better without tempting me to sinful compromise?
  • Will I benefit in any way from viewing this program or visiting this web site?

You may not see the significance to all of these questions, but the important thing to remember is that the author is calling us to deliberate and active viewing. As he writes, “glorifying God is an intentional pursuit.”

I was particularly struck by the second question under the heart section. Escape has often been my intent behind viewing media. I have lost three grandparents since 2005 (the fourth had already passed away in 2001) and each night after hearing the news I remember having watched movies or vast amounts of television (I watched a MacGuyver marathon when my first grandmother passed away in 2005). Rather than engaging God with my hurt, I instead attempted to apply the numbing balm of mass media. Rather than trusting that the Holy Spirit is my Comforter, I instead sought comfort in distraction and misdirection.

Chapter 3: “God, My Heart, and Music” by Bob Kauflin

Kauflin describes music as a carrier of content, context, and culture. As such, the call for Christians is to carefully consider that which we engage and absorb. Here are few of the cultural standards that music (whether “secular” or even “Christian”) can carry:

  • Independence and rebellion
  • Emotionalism
  • Temporal narcissism (the love of the present, inferiority of anything old)
  • Love of pleasure
  • Sexual immorality
  • Transience

In the end, music is a means to joy, but it is not joy itself. As Kauflin quotes C.S. Lewis, “The books or the music in which we thought the beauty was located will betray us if we trust to them…For they are not the thing itself; they are only the scent of a flower we have not found, the echo of a tune we have not heard, news from a country we have never yet visited.” Music is intended, like all things, to stir our affections for God. When music directs our passions elsewhere, it has become a carrier of idolatry. “Music is a precious gift, but it makes a terrible god.”

Chapter 4: “God, My Heart, and Stuff” by Dave Harvey

Harvey’s chapter exposes the lust of materialism and covetousness which he defines as “desiring stuff too much or desiring too much stuff.” Using the imagery of chains that enslave us to discontentment and inordinate desire, he examines the following thoughts:

  • My stuff makes me happy
  • My stuff makes me important
  • My stuff makes me secure

He warns of the inherent dangers (not inherent wickedness) of prosperity and points us to the remedies found in the gospel. Quoting John Owen, “when someone sets his affections upon the cross and the love of Christ, he crucifies the world as a dead and undesirable thing. The baits of sin lose their attraction and disappear. Fill your affections with the cross of Christ and you will find no room for sin.” He offers the following practical directions:

  • Consider your true riches
  • Confess and repent
  • Express specific gratitude
  • De-materialize your life
  • Give generously

Chapter 5: “God, My Heart, and Clothes” by C.J. Mahaney

Mahaney’s chapter was the one with which I was most unmoved. Not because it was incorrect or overreactive, but rather because it focused on modesty for women and excluded what I thought would have been a helpful corrective to the lure of fashion and its relationship to our pride. Then again, I suppose most of the concerns of slavery to fashion would be corrected against by applying wisdom from the previous chapter on materialism.

The basic idea behind Mahaney’s chapter is a call for women in particular to watch what they expose and emphasize in their dress for the sake of the men around them. We should all dress in a way that does not contradict the message that we profess.

Chapter 6: “How to Love the World” by Jeff Purswell

After five chapters fleshing out what John meant by calling us to not love the world, Purswell reminds us that there is a healthy type of love for the world. Once again, the key is intentionality and purpose. We must not assume that our love for the world is of the right type, but should rather test it. Purswell gives us three tasks to help in our interaction with the world:

  • Enjoy the world
  • Engage the world
  • Evangelize the world

Conclusion:

You may not agree with everything written in Worldliness. You might not struggle as much with certain areas as others and thus might find some chapters somewhat unhelpful. However, I would encourage you to take seriously the call to not love the world or drift into worldliness. Know your tendencies, know your weaknesses and inclinations.

The world is enticing and alluring and we are far less steadfast than we often like to believe. I think this book is a helpful assessment of our diligence in protecting against certain seductions of a fallen world.


[1] William Law. A Serious Call to a Devout and Holy Life. New York: Vintage Books, 2002, 204-205.

Living in this world has a tendency to disorient the believer. We can easily grow distracted by the glimmer and shine of fleeting pleasures or we simply stop thinking about Christ as we contemplate more on ourselves. Rather than staying focused on the center of our faith, we wander into the periphery.

C.J. Mahaney has written an excellent little booklet called “The Cross Centered Life” in which he highlights this unfortunate propensity, reorients us to the essential and central truth that “Christ died for our sins and rose”, and gives a few strategies for fighting to get back to the cross.

According to Mahaney, here are some evidences that one’s life has moved from the center of the cross to the periphery:

  • You often lack joy
  • You’re not consistently growing in spiritual maturity
  • Your love for God lacks passion
  • You’re always looking for some new technique, some “new truth” or new experience that will pull all the pieces of your faith together

Whether you see this tendency in yourself or not, I would highly encourage you to take some time to read Mahaney’s helpful thoughts.

1 Corinthians 15:1-5 “Now I would remind you, brothers, of the gospel I preached to you, which you received, in which you stand, and by which you are being saved, if you hold fast to the word I preached to you—unless you believed in vain. For I delivered to you as of first importance what I also received: that Christ died for our sins in accordance with the Scriptures, that he was buried, that he was raised on the third day in accordance with the Scriptures, and that he appeared to Cephas, then to the twelve.”

I just finished reading Just Do Something by Kevin DeYoung and found it to be an excellent resource for those of us who struggle to discern God’s will for their lives.

DeYoung helpfully distinguishes between the various ways in which we might understand “God’s will.”  For example, we can speak of God’s will of decree (also known as His sovereign will – that which He will surely accomplish) or we can speak of God’s will of desire (also known as His moral will – what He has revealed in the Scriptures).  Both of these are appropriate and theological uses of the phrase “the will of God.”

In addition, there is a third way that we sometimes use the phrase and this usage is where DeYoung spends most of his time in the book.  This third manner is called God’s will of direction and includes questions such as “whom should I marry?” and “where should I work?”  These are non-moral, non-revealed questions which we must all answer every day.

If you are paralyzed by indecision or plagued by guilt for such decisions, then this book should prove to be very helpful.

Here are a few of my favorite quotes:

“I’d like us to consider that maybe we have difficulty discovering God’s wonderful plan for our lives because, if the truth be told, He doesn’t really intend to tell us what it is. And maybe we’re wrong to expect Him to.”

“God has a wonderful plan for your life – a plan that will take you through trial and triumph as you are transformed into the image of His Son (Romans 8:28-29). Of this we can be absolutely confident. But God’s normal way of operation is not to show this plan to us ahead of time – in retrospect, maybe; in advance, rarely.”

“Passivity is a plague among Christians. It’s not just that we don’t do anything; it’s that we feel spiritual for not doing anything.”

“Live for God. Obey the Scriptures. Think of others before yourself. Be holy. Love Jesus. And as you do these things, do whatever else you like, with whomever you like, wherever you like, and you’ll be walking in the will of God.”

Here is a link to a talk by DeYoung on this subject at a recent conference for those who are less inclined to read (in which case you probably would not be reading this blog).

Occasionally in evangelicalism there appears a book which somehow sweeps the American church off of its feet in a flutter of word of mouth and praise. Think “Prayer of Jabez” or “The Purpose Driven Life.” Sometimes such books are good, more often than not they leave something to be desired. This is undoubtedly a result of a dilution of the importance of God’s revelation in the life of the modern American church. As God’s word concerning Himself is devalued, man’s thoughts become elevated to the detriment of the body. Man therefore begins to reconfigure and reconceive God according to his own whims.

“The Shack” is a relatively new work which is becoming quite popular in the world of American evangelicalism. It has recently moved to the number one spot on the New York Times bestseller list for paperback trade fiction. In addition, at least one church has taken to pass out the book to all of her members. I have heard a number of reports about the book with very contrasting analyses.

  • Eugene Peterson, Professor Emeritus of Spiritual Theology at Regent College in Vancouver, says it “has the potential to do for our generation what John Bunyan’s The Pilgrim Progress did for his.”
  • Dr. Albert Mohler, President of Southern Baptist Theological Seminary, says, “This book includes undiluted heresy.”
  • Singer and songwriter Michael W. Smith says “The Shack will leave you craving for the presence of God.”
  • Mark Driscoll, Pastor of Mars Hill Church in Seattle, says, “Regarding the Trinity, it’s actually heretical.”

As we have had a few inquiries about the work, I spent the last week reading it. I found the story to be quite engaging, but the theological content was very concerning. While the work does not claim to be a theological treatise, the subject matter is inherently theological in that it deals specifically with those grandest of Christian doctrines (the nature of God, the nature of revelation, the nature of salvation, the relationship of suffering to God’s sovereignty, etc.).

Due to the numerous theological inaccuracies which the book contains, I urge readers to be very cautious and critical (in the sense of active interaction) if they choose to read it.

Below is an in-depth review of the book with which I would generally agree:

http://www.challies.com/media/The_Shack.pdf

Blogs:

Reviews:

,